Walton: A Looking Glass into Victor and his Monster

In examining Frankenstein compared to other texts, there are many similarities in themes and images. Even in the pieces of text within Frankenstein there are many noticeable comparisons. The second letter before the story begins contains many similar references to the monster’s later desires and problems. Walton shares the combined qualities of both Victor and his monster that are prevalent in the later story.

As Walton writes to his sister, Margaret, he expresses his worries of being stuck in the ice at sea. He states, “But I have one want which I have never yet been able to satisfy; and the absence of the object of which I now feel as a most severe evil. I have no friend, Margaret: when I am glowing with the enthusiasm of success, there will be none to participate my joy; if I am assailed by disappointment, no one will endeavour to sustain me in dejection” (31). Walton admits that he is looking for companionship and someone with whom he can share his success and failures. This feeling parallels the monster’s later longing for a companion who he can share his life with. He thinks it is unfair and unnatural to live alone in the cold. Walton also parallels Victor when he states, “I am too ardent in execution, and too impatient of difficulties. But it is a still greater evil to me that I am self-educated” (31). Alike to Victor, Walton is very enthusiastic in his work and educated himself with books like Victor does in his college studies and experiments. Finally, Walton states, “It is impossible to communicate to you a conception of the trembling sensation, half pleasurable and half fearful, with which I am preparing to depart. I am going to unexplored regions” (33). Walton is excited in his work just as Victor was in a state of excitement while he was creating his monster. While Walton is exploring the world, Victor is exploring previously undiscovered science. Both parallel each other in their ardent work and education.

The letters prefacing the novel relate to and foreshadow the feelings and actions of both Victor and his monster later in the novel. Although the letters are not an actual part of the novel, the parallels between Walton, Victor, and the monster are unmistakable. Walton shares the monster’s longing for companionship while he also has the same love for his work and desire to discover unexplored areas of the world as does Victor.

Victor: Creator or Slave?

After telling his story, the monster asks Victor to create for him a female counterpart. Worrying over the safety of his family, Victor agrees as long as the monster promises to no longer harm anyone and to leave Europe. Dreading his new task, Victor starts his research and planning for the new monster. Midway through, Victor comes to the realization that giving the monster a “wife” could make the monster want children and then there would be an even greater issue than just having the one monster exist. Appalled by this realization, Victor takes apart the monster that he had started to create and takes a boat out onto the water to dump the body. The monster sees Victor doing so and becomes enraged with Victor threatening to turn up on Victor’s wedding night. Victor falls asleep in the boat and wakes up lost. When he gets to shore, he encounters strangers who accuse him of a murder. Upon seeing the murdered man, Victor realizes it is his friend Henry, who has the same marks on his neck as William did. Victor assumes this was the monster’s doing, but is accused and put into prison. Victor’s father comes to get him out and take him back home where Victor agrees to marry Elizabeth. On their wedding night, Victor hears a scream and finds Elizabeth strangled to death and sees the monster outside the window. The father dies from his grief and Victor decides to find and destroy the monster.

When the monster finds Victor taking apart the female monster, the monster yells at Victor saying, “Slave, I have reasoned with you, but you have proved yourself unworthy of my condescension. Remember that I have power; you believe yourself miserable, but I can make you so wretched that the light of day will be hateful to you. You are my creator, but I am your master; — obey!” (146). Upon first reading this passage, I was confused as to who was speaking due to the word “Slave”. Victor being the creator would make the reader think the monster would be referred to as the “slave”; however, in this case, the monster is referring to Victor as his slave. He is emphasizing his control over Victor’s actions, thus referring to himself as Victor’s “master”.  Just because Victor created the monster does not mean that he can control it. Another interesting point in this passage is when the monster calls Victor “wretched”. This is the same description that Victor uses for the monster throughout the novel. Their parallel description emphasizes their similar situations that are arising. The monster is alone because he is “wretched” in appearance. In calling Victor the same thing, it foreshadows the later killing of Victor’s family, leaving Victor alone because he has become “wretched”.

After reading chapter twenty six, I am left to wonder how Victor will go about finding the monster and if he does find it, how will he destroy the monster or will he even have the nerve to do so? If he does not find the monster and destroy it, will the monster continue to kill people close to Victor until he is completely alone or merely move on and give up?

Frankenstein: Creating Questions or Monsters?

The beginning of Frankenstein leaves the reader with more questions rather than answers to the haunting original story of the beloved green monster. Starting the novel with only a background of the animated movies results in more confusion than understanding. The beginning letters seem apparently unrelated to the story until reading more into the novel. The reader is unaware of who the stranger is who Robert Walton comes across. Reading the letters, I was wondering how Walton fit into the story of a scientist and his monster. After reading the first ten chapters, I was still left with a few questions. I feel that the creating of the monster was rushed into and was not explained very well. The actual creating of the monster was also a little confusing. I feel that the most anticipated part of the story was skimmed over and then the resulting mental state of Victor was too deeply examined. I feel if the creation of the monster was described more in depth, then Victor’s resulting state of mind would be easier to understand.

 After the initial making of the monster and Victor’s reaction, more of the problem of the story is revealed. According to Victor, the monster killed Victor’s younger brother William and a family friend, Justine, is being accused of the murder. Once Victor hears this news, he takes the death of his brother as his own fault because he was the one who created the monster who killed William. Victor views the monster as his ultimate downfall. “I was encompasses by a cloud which no beneficial influence could penetrate. The wounded deer dragging its fainting limbs to some untrodden brake, there to gaze upon the arrow which had pierced it, and to die – was but a type of me.” Victor relates himself to a deer being shot with an arrow. In this case, the monster is the arrow stuck in Victor, slowly killing him. Victor takes upon the responsibility of the monster’s doings and murders and understands that he is the only one who could truly stop the monster since he is the creator.

 At the end of chapter ten I am left to wonder what the monster’s story will be that he tells Victor and whether Victor will decide to destroy his monster or not. If he does decide to destroy the monster, how will he go about doing so? If the monster is to resemble Victor’s flawed self, then simply destroying the monster will not go without consequences and struggles.

Social Escape in Reading (Final)

Honor Code Statement: I pledge my honor that I have completed this work in accordance with the Honor Code.

Self- Evaluation: I feel that my ability to compare reading as an escape yet a social activity is something I am proud of. At first I merely said it was an escape, but in my revision, I added another idea into my essay and connected it throughout the paragraphs. I feel I could still work on my organization of my ideas a bit to make them flow better. In the future, I could see myself returning to this essay to further my argument.

                                                    Social Escape in Reading                      

Reading is something that is either viewed as fun, intellectual, or tedious; a social activity, or a private one. Ever since I was a child, I viewed reading as something fun and relaxing and a way to escape; however, while the act of reading is private, reading is not merely an individualized activity. Reading provides a way to connect with others over a moving story and to relate to others by falling in love with the same characters. Reading is not work to me, nor is it something I dread as an assignment in school. Reading provides a private escape from the world. Although many assume writing coincides with how someone views reading, in my mind, writing is the ultimate assignment I dread in school. Although reading and writing are closely related, I view reading as one of the most natural enjoyments and social aspects of life whereas writing serves as an individual job needing to be done.

As a child, I can remember visiting the library every Saturday with my mother and checking out at least twenty picture books that I would read throughout the week. Reading helped me get into my schoolwork more and advance intellectually. It helped me see my education as something that could be fun instead of something merely mandatory to get through life. I remember when I started to read the Magic Tree House books and the first time I read one within two days. To me, that was a huge accomplishment that I was proud of. I was so enthralled with the stories that I could not pull myself away. I can remember going to school and connecting with my friends over the series and who our favorite characters were. These books were a way for me to connect with my classmates and bring me further into my schooling. Days when new books were assigned in English class or what was then called “Reading” class, I would be excited to learn about the world of these new characters rather than the average student who would roll their eyes and dread the thought of having to read for school. Although reading advanced my relationship with my academics, writing drove me away. Some may find it strange that one can love reading so much, but then when it comes to writing it is something they dread. For me, writing is a job I have to work at whereas reading is calming and easygoing for me. Transitioning into high school, my love of reading followed with me and grew even more while writing turned into an even more individualized and private task.

            As a teenager in high school, my academics got harder and it took more work to achieve the same grades. After a hard day at school, I would come home and dive into a book and thus into a different world. Finding a new story I loved would allow me to relax and refresh my mind from all the work I had to do for school. While reading helped me escape, it also helped me to connect with my friends. We would all trade books with each other and discuss our favorite characters and wait anxiously together for the next book in a series to come out. Reading assigned books for school was still my favorite assignment and I was excited each time my teacher would introduce a new story to us. While I find reading to be a social act, writing; however, is much more of an individual act. Writing for me has always been something to be worked on individually and then graded. No input from others, just my own thoughts and words. My troubles with writing have continued to followe me for many years. In Birkerts’ words, “adolescence is the ideal laboratory for the study of reading and self formation” (89). While I still received mostly good grades on my papers, I had a hard time writing and analyzing the texts. While reading was my best escape, when it came to analyzing, it was also my greatest fear. I could understand the novels and find the underlying meaning, but when I had to find the figurative language, I struggled in analyzing it. To many, writing comes easily to them, being able to form ideas in their heads and put these ideas together fluently into an essay, while I struggle to even formulate the ideas at times. While many view writing as their escape and way to express themselves and reading as their dreaded enemy, I find reading my freedom and writing to be my flaw.  

In Birkerts’ novel, The Gutenberg Elegies, he explains his worries about technology

overtaking the values of literature. He believes that technology has taken the meaning away from literature in that the world of reading and writing has become shallow and is no longer based off of wisdom. He states, “wisdom is a seeing through facts, a penetration to the underlying laws and patterns” (75). In many ways, my experiences with reading are similar to his fears. In reading older books, I find the depth of the stories and characters to be difficult to analyze whereas more modern stories are more shallow and easier to interpret thus allowing teens to relate to each other through more accessible stories. Reading has gone from being an art of wisdom to an art of relaxation as a social activity. As many find reading as an escape, Birkerts states, “what made me a reader were the experiences I got from the books themselves” (35). It is not only the story that gives the reader joy but the experiences you get from the actual books. Reading as a child and going to the library was an experience for me that I will always remember not because of the stories themselves, but because of the actual action of going to the library and picking out the physical books. Now when I think about that time, I do not remember the stories. I merely remember the action of picking out the books. Reading a book also inspires some to join activities such as book clubs thus making reading a social aspect. People in book clubs are usually those who appreciate a physical book and mot merely the story on a digital screen. I agree with Birkerts that if literature becomes absorbed in technology, then the magic of the story will not be the same. People will lose the connection between people who share the love of the stories they read. The presence of the book itself brings a much better experience along with the story the writer presents. As society progresses into a technological era, so does the art of literature and writing. My experience with reading makes me worry as well of the technological influence on literature. Reading is an art that will never die.

            Reading is multiple individualized experiences of escape, brought together into one social act while writing is a very private and personal task. Many people read stories on their own and then come together to share their love for the story and the characters. Reading played a major role in my childhood as I made friends through the common books I read with my peers and had a way to connect with them. As Birkerts fears technology will soon overtake literature, I do as well. Turning books into digital forms takes away from the social aspect of reading and the love of the physical book. While reading is a beloved part of my life, my struggles with writing have followed me through my school years. To me, writing is a weight on me that pushes me constantly until it is finally done. It is a task that is procrastinated while reading is a wonder that calls to me for hours at a time. Reading will always be a major part of my life and will continue to be a social aspect as crowds of people wait together for hours overnight for the release of the next story on the characters these people all share the same love for.

Escape in Social Reading

Revision process: After rereading my essay, I decided I needed a stronger argument or at least another aspect of my argument. I decided to argue against Birkerts that reading is not merely a private activity, but a social one bringing people together over the love of the same characters. With adding this idea, I added different portions to each of my paragraphs connecting my previous ideas with my new one. I added more examples of how reading is a social aspect as well as addressing Birkerts argument in relation to my new idea. Finally, I added a conclusion to my essay that sums up my ideas and adds a little example at the end to cause the reader to further consider my argument.

 

Reading is something that is either viewed as fun, intellectual, or tedious. A social activity, or a private one. Ever since I was a child, I viewed reading as something fun and relaxing and a way to escape; however, while the act of reading is private, reading is not merely an individualized activity. Reading provides a way to connect with others over a moving story and to relate to others by falling in love with the same characters. Reading is not work to me, nor is it something I dread as an assignment in school. Reading provides a private escape from the world. Although many assume writing coincides with how someone views reading, in my mind, writing is the ultimate assignment I dread in school. Although reading and writing are closely related, I view reading as one of the most natural enjoyments and social aspects of life whereas writing serves as a job needing to be done.

As a child, I can remember visiting the library every Saturday with my mother and checking out at least twenty picture books that I would read throughout the week. Reading helped me get into my schoolwork more and advance intellectually. It helped me see my education as something that could be fun instead of something merely mandatory to get through life. I remember when I started to read the Magic Tree House books and the first time I read one within two days. To me, that was a huge accomplishment that I was proud of. I was so enthralled with the stories that I couldn’t pull myself away. I can remember going to school and connecting with my friends over the series and who our favorite characters were. These books were a way for me to connect with my classmates and bring me further into my schooling. Days when new books were assigned in English class or what was then called “Reading” class, I would be excited to learn about the world of these new characters rather than the average student who would roll their eyes and dread the thought of having to read for school. Although reading advanced my relationship with my academics, writing drove me away. Some may find it strange that one can love reading so much, but then when it comes to writing it is something they dread. For me, writing is a job I have to work at whereas reading is calming and easygoing for me. Transitioning into high school, my love of reading followed with me and grew even more.

            As a teenager in high school, my academics got harder and it took more work to achieve the same grades. After a hard day at school, I would come home and dive into a book and thus into a different world. Finding a new story I loved would allow me to relax and refresh my mind from all the work I had to do for school. While reading helped me escape, it also helped me to connect with my friends. We would all trade books with each other and discuss our favorite characters and wait anxiously together for the next book in a series to come out. Reading assigned books for school was still my favorite assignment and I was excited each time my teacher would introduce a new story to us. While reading followed me into my later years, my troubles with writing followed me as well. In Birkerts’ words, “adolescence is the ideal laboratory for the study of reading and self formation” (89). While I still received mostly good grades on my papers, I still had a hard time writing and analyzing the texts. While reading was my best escape, when it came to analyzing, it was also my greatest fear. I could understand the novels and find the underlying meaning, but when I had to find the figurative language, I struggled in analyzing it. To many, writing comes easily to them, being able to form ideas in their heads and put these ideas together fluently into an essay, while I struggle to even formulate the ideas at times. While many view writing as their escape and way to express themselves and reading as their dreaded enemy, I find reading my freedom and writing to be my flaw.  

In Birkerts’ novel, The Gutenberg Elegies, he explains his worries about technology

overtaking the values of literature. He believes that technology has taken the meaning away from literature in that the world of reading and writing has become shallow and is no longer based off of wisdom. He states, “wisdom is a seeing through facts, a penetration to the underlying laws and patterns” (75). In many ways, my experiences with reading are similar to his fears. In reading older books, I find the depth of the stories and characters to be difficult to analyze whereas more modern stories are more shallow and easier to interpret thus allowing teens to relate to each other through more accessible stories. Reading has gone from being an art of wisdom to an art of relaxation a social activity. As many find reading as an escape, Birkerts states, “what made me a reader were the experiences I got from the books themselves” (35). It is not only the story that gives the reader joy but the experiences you get from the actual books. Reading as a child and going to the library was an experience for me that I will always remember not because of the stories themselves, but because of the actual action of going to the library and picking out the physical books. Now when I think about that time, I do not remember the stories. I merely remember the action of picking out the books. Reading a book also inspires some to join activities such as book clubs thus making reading a social aspect. People in book clubs are usually those who appreciate a physical book and mot merely the story on a digital screen. I agree with Birkerts that if literature becomes absorbed in technology, then the magic of the story will not be the same. People will lose the connection between people share the love of the stores they read. The presence of the book itself brings a much better experience along with the story the writer presents. As society progresses into a technological era, so does the art of literature and writing. My experience with reading makes me worry as well of the technological influence on literature. Reading is an art that will never die.

            Reading is multiple individualized experiences brought together into one social act. Many people read stories on their own and then come together to share their love for the story and the characters. Reading played a major role in my childhood as I made friends through the common books I read with my peers and had a way to connect with them. As Birkerts fears technology will soon overtake literature, I do as well. Turning books into digital forms takes away from the social aspect of reading and the love of the physical book. While reading is a beloved part of my life, my struggles with writing have followed me through my school years. To me, writing is a weight on me that pushes me constantly until it is finally done. It is a task that is procrastinated while reading is a wonder that calls to me for hours at a time. Reading will always be a major part of my life and will continue to be a social aspect as crowds of people wait together for hours overnight for the release of the next story on the characters these people all share the same love for.

Escape in Reading

Reading is something that is either viewed as fun, intellectual, or tedious. Ever since I was a child, I viewed reading as something fun and relaxing and a way to escape. Reading is not work to me, nor is it something I dread as an assignment in school. Reading provides a private escape from the world. Although many assume writing coincided with how someone views reading, in my mind, writing is the ultimate assignment I dread in school. Although reading and writing are closely related, I view reading as one of the most natural enjoyments of life whereas writing serves as a job needing to be done.

As a child, I can remember visiting the library every Saturday with my mother and checking out at least twenty picture books that I would read throughout the week. As a child, reading helped me get into my schoolwork more and advance intellectually. Reading helped me see my education as something that could be fun instead of something merely mandatory to get through life. I remember when I started to read the Magic Tree House books and the first time I read one within two days. To me, that was a huge accomplishment that I was proud of. I was so enthralled with the stories that I couldn’t pull myself away. Days when new books were assigned in English class or what was then called “Reading” class, I would be excited to learn about the world of these new characters rather than the average student who would roll their eyes and dread the thought of having to read for school. Although reading advanced my relationship with my academics, writing drove me away. Some may find it strange that one can love reading so much, but then when it comes to writing it is something they dread. For me, writing is a job I have to work at whereas reading is calming and easygoing for me. Transitioning into high school, my love of reading followed with me and grew even more.

 As a teenager in high school, my academics got harder and it took more work to achieve the same grades. After a hard day at school, I would come home and dive into a book and thus into a different world. Finding a new story I loved would allow me to relax and refresh my mind from all the work I had to do for school. Reading assigned books for school was still my favorite assignment and I was excited each time my teacher would introduce a new story to us. While reading followed me into my later years, my troubles with writing followed me as well. In Birkerts’ words, “adolescence is the ideal laboratory for the study of reading and self formation” (89). While I still received mostly good grades on my papers, I still had a hard time writing and analyzing the texts. While reading was my best escape, when it came to analyzing, it was also my greatest fear. I could understand the novels and find the underlying meaning, but when I had to find the figurative language, I struggled in analyzing it. While reading has been one of the most important parts of my life growing up, writing was one of my most feared.

In Birkerts’ novel, The Gutenberg Elegies, he explains his worries about technology overtaking the values of literature. He believes that technology has taken the meaning away from literature in that the world of reading and writing has become shallow and is no longer based off of wisdom. He states, “wisdom is a seeing through facts, a penetration to the underlying laws and pattern” (75). In many ways, my experiences with reading are similar to his fears. In reading older books, I find the depth of the stories and characters to be difficult to analyze whereas more modern stories are more shallow and easier to interpret. Reading has gone from being an art of wisdom to an art of relaxation. As many find reading as an escape, Birkerts states, “what made me a reader were the experiences I got from the books themselves” (35). It is not only the story that gives the reader joy but the experiences you get from the actual books. Reading as a child and going to the library was an experience for me that I will always remember not because of the stories themselves, but because of the actual action of going to the library and picking out the physical books. Now when I think about that time, I do not remember the stories. I merely remember the action of picking out the books. I agree with Birkerts that if literature becomes absorbed in technology, then the magic of the story will not be the same. The presence of the book itself brings a much better experience along with the story the writer presents. As society progresses into a technological era, so does the art of literature and writing. My experience with reading makes me worry as well of the technological influence on literature. Reading is an art that will never die.

A Technological Fate for Literature

In chapter one of Birkert’s novel, he expresses his worry over the literary world becoming overtaken by technology. He fears publishing books will no longer exist in the future. He states, “Theses large-scale changes bode ill for authorship, at least of the kind I would pursue.” Publishers are signing off less on the publication of books that will only sell a few thousand copies and are instead only approving books that will become bestsellers, thus diminishing the amount of available literature to newer generations. He states his fear as, “I worry not only that the  world will become increasingly alien and inhospitable to me, but also that I will be gradually coerced into living against  my natural grain, forced to adapt to a pace and a level of technological complexity does not suit me, and driven to interact with others in certain prescribed ways.” In chapter two, he recalls how his life was influenced by books and his journey through his struggles in writing. He describes the different jobs he held in various book stores before leaving to commit himself to writing a book even though his first attempt did not bring the results he wanted.

I found I could not connect much with the first chapter except for when he described how the class did not seem interested in the assigned reading because they could not easily understand it. I found myself agreeing more with the students in that scenario than with Birkert because in my encounters with academic reading, there have been multiple scenarios when I did not enjoy the reading merely because I could not connects with it. I could not really connect with the discussion on how technology is taking over literature merely because I am part of the generation that is so involved in technology; however, I agree that books are one part of the world that should not be overtaken by technology. Being an avid reader myself, I detest the thought that one day there will no longer be books in the world, only replaced by digital page turning and fake swooshes to mimic the graces of an actual book. In the second chapter, when he recalls his relationship with books, I found myself finding many similarities between him and myself. Ever since I was a little kid, I agreed with Birkert’s view of “books as a refuge”. They allow you to enter into another world and get lost in those words. Birkert claimed, “What made me a reader were the experiences I got from the books themselves.” When reading a book, you get lost in the stories and they provide you with the experiences the characters go through. After reading these initial chapters, I found myself both disagreeing and agreeing with Birkert in different parts of his discussion. Reading should not fall victim to technology, but at the same time, it is impossible for the art of literature to remain how it is today.

After reading, I wonder what Birkert thinks of the digital readers today such as the Nook or Kindle. Is he appalled by his correct prediction for the fate of literature? Or is he embracing this new technology and enjoying the benefits that some people see? In both situations, I found Birkert’s discussion quite engaging and relative to the technology that is appearing today.

Casual vs. Formal Intellectualism

After reading Graff’s argument on incorporating “street smarts” into the academic setting, I find that I somewhat agree with his premise, but at the same time find flaws in his proposition. He believes that if schools incorporate topics that students find interesting such as sports, then they will be more likely to participate and get involved with the topic than if they were discussing something academic such as politics or history. One of Graff’s main points was that “intellectual resources go unnoticed because they are tied to ostensibly anti-intellectual interests.” While students hold the potential to advance their intellectual abilities, the topics they are forced to study in school refrains them from discovering their hidden intellectualism. Berry’s proposition is however opposite. He believes that proper language is a necessity in schools that has become more of a specialty than a common academic subject.

While Graff’s is a solid argument, I feel as though incorporating too many aspects of “street smarts” into the academic setting would create too much of a casual air, thus causing students to not take their academics as seriously. Nowadays there is a distinct separation between academics and social discussions. Combing the two together would cause a conflict of interests in the academic setting. When Graff made his argument, the topics qualifying as social interests were much different than they are today. With today’s topics, discussing social interests may not be as constructive as they would be when Graff was in school. Although the academic setting could become too casual, his statement that “intellectual resources go unnoticed because they are tied to ostensibly anti- intellectual interests” can be very true. Many students lose interest in classes because either they find the subject boring or they do not understand or excel at that specific topic. By adding these “anti-intellectual interests” in small doses, students may become more interested in the subject matter and be more likely to find more capabilities with different topics that they did not know they held. While adding some social interests would most likely stimulate the intellectual abilities of students, making an entirely social academic setting would most likely cripple some of the students’ intellectual abilities. I however agree with Berry that language is a topic that should be taught throughout schooling and is not something that should be specialized. No matter what you are specializing in, language is a necessity in every subject.

After reading, I am left to consider whether or not Graff was proposing to make all of the academic setting incorporated with social interests or if he merely considered adding occasional social interests to push students to become more involved in their academic classes. As with Berry, I wonder at what point we bring too much language into subjects. If we try to bring more language into topics, will it eventually overtake that topic and mainly only focus on the language you use?